{{ b.name }}
{{ p }}
Seven businesses under one ownership, each on its own systems. What Azertica proposes for each one, and what becomes possible once they are connected.
This document follows our visit to Yonna Group. Yonna operates seven distinct businesses under one ownership: a foreign exchange bureau, a mobile wallet, a Shariah-compliant insurer, an Islamic microfinance institution, an import and distribution company, an agribusiness venture, and a telecom. Each runs on its own systems, largely disconnected from the others.
This document sets out what Azertica proposes for each of the seven businesses individually, then what becomes possible once they are connected. It closes with a recommended order to take them in, a delivery approach, and next steps.
The seven businesses share ownership but not infrastructure. Each has grown on its own systems and habits, shaped by what that particular business needed at the time. That independence has let each one move at its own pace, but it also means the group has no shared view of its own customers, no common compliance process, and no way to see across the businesses at once.
The proposals in sections 4 to 10 are written for each business on its own terms, solving the problems specific to it. Section 11 then describes what a shared layer across all seven could add, once individual needs are met.
The most valuable part of this proposal is not any single business: it is what connecting the seven makes possible.
We flag it here, early, because it is easy to lose sight of that while reading seven business-by-business sections in a row. Jump to the group platform →
Seven businesses at once is a lot to take in together, so each gets its own section, written to the same length, in the order Yonna's own materials listed them rather than by any ranking of importance.
Equal length does not mean equal certainty. The Foreign Exchange Bureau and the Islamic Microfinance proposals are built on a reasonably clear picture of how those businesses run. Wallet and Agribusiness are not: both sections are a starting point for a conversation, not a reflection of how well we understand those two businesses today, and we say so again where they appear.
Listed in the order Yonna's own materials present them.
{{ p }}
{{ p }}
Each business above can be improved on its own terms, independently of the others. But four things only become possible once the seven are connected, and none of them require replacing what each business already runs.
{{ l.d }}
Layers 2 and 4 share customer data across a bank-interoperable wallet, an MFI, and an insurer, each of which likely answers to its own regulator. We treat that as a compliance question to settle with the Central Bank of The Gambia and the insurance regulator before build, not as a detail to resolve during implementation.
Seven businesses cannot be taken on at once, and they should not be. We recommend an order based on two things: how far each business's current process is from what a platform would provide, and how much groundwork we already have to act on.
{{ s.w }}
Seven businesses means seven points of coordination, not one. The sequence in section 12 and the timeline in any individual project both depend on the following being in place.
{{ d.d }}
Each business is scoped and delivered as its own project, on the sequence above, starting with a short discovery phase to confirm current processes, data, and priorities with the team that runs it day to day. Nothing is built against assumptions alone.
The platform layers in section 11 are introduced progressively as each business comes online, rather than as a single upfront undertaking. This keeps each phase useful on its own, whether or not a later phase happens on the same timeline.
Azertica already builds for regulated, compliance-heavy sectors in the sub-region, including finance and health, and works with institutional counterparts such as Senegal's Ministry of Health and a regional central bank.
Offline-first design is standard practice for us, not an afterthought, which matters for field operations such as YIMF's agents or the Bureau's branch network.
Claims are processed manually, which means slow settlement, no visibility on pending volumes, and limited protection against fraud or duplicates.
Every step is timestamped, so management sees settlement time and backlog per branch and per product.
{{ it }}
Less manual handling per claim, fewer fraudulent or duplicate payouts, and faster settlement for customers.
Illustrative estimate from the assumptions above. Figures will be replaced with Yonna's real volumes and costs during discovery.
For health takaful products, direct connection with partner clinics running JammSanté, Azertica's hospital management platform, so providers submit claims electronically.
Production system, staff training, and 3 months of post-launch support.
Today a customer is likely registered separately in each entity. A single identity cuts onboarding cost, strengthens AML controls, and lets Yonna offer products across entities (a Y Cell subscriber becomes a wallet user, then a financing or takaful customer).
Show your ID once, at any Yonna branch or on your phone, and you are recognised everywhere: Y Cell, Yonna Wallet, Yonna Islamic Microfinance, Yonna Islamic Insurance and Yonna Forex Bureau.
One view of each customer across the group, lower onboarding cost, stronger anti-fraud and AML controls, and a natural path to sell more services to the same customer.
→ {{ n }}
A customer registers once, then each new Yonna service reuses what is already verified. Each step adds history to the same profile, so the customer's options grow as their relationship with Yonna grows.
Today a customer is likely registered separately in each entity. With YonnaPass, the identity check happens once and every entity reuses it.
Six paths a customer or a Yonna team can take. Blue steps are where YonnaPass does the work: an identity check that is not repeated, or a signal carried from one entity to another.
{{ uc.without }}
{{ uc.with }}
Once the five share one verified profile, information that one entity already holds becomes useful to another, always within the customer's consent.
Every customer who is already known to another Yonna entity is one registration, one ID check and one paper file Yonna no longer repeats.
Illustrative estimate from the assumptions above. Figures will be replaced with Yonna's real volumes and costs during discovery.
YonnaPass has three levels, so customers start quickly and verify more only when they need higher-value services.
Exact limits per level will be set with Yonna's compliance team to match the requirements of each licensed entity.
Entities connect to YonnaPass rather than copying customer data between each other.
Each entity keeps its own systems and connects to YonnaPass to read and update the shared customer profile.
{{ it }}
Customers decide which Yonna entities can use their profile, and every use is logged.
YonnaPass launches in about 6 months, starting with Y Cell and Yonna Wallet, where most new customers arrive.
Deliverable: registry, APIs, onboarding app for branches, and migration of existing customer records.